Instagram

Op-Ed: Construction Bill Would Harm Mayor’s MWBE and Job Creation Initiatives

Mayor Bill de Blasio has set laudable and ambitious goals for creating jobs and supporting minority- and women-owned businesses across New York City. But these initiatives are now at risk of being undermined by ill-conceived City Council legislation – Intro 1447 – that would significantly change the city’s construction industry.

Faith leaders and minority community advocates like myself are extremely concerned that City Council is considering a vote on Intro 1447 as early as September 7. MWBEs were unfairly left out of the discussion around this bill, which apparently went on for over a year without any outreach to our community. The result is that by the time we were given an opportunity to raise our concerns, we were already being presented with a Trojan horse of a bill that threatens to put MWBEs out of business. That is unacceptable and must change now.

Council members need to go back to the drawing board on Intro 1447 and take a more comprehensive approach that actually includes the voices of minority workers and business owners. And if Mayor de Blasio wants to achieve his goals for new jobs and MWBEs, he should let them know that the bill is a non-starter.

The de Blasio administration has pledged to spur the creation of 100,000 jobs over the next decade, all of which would pay at least $50,000 per year or offer a clear path to that salary level. The administration has also committed to ensuring that at least 30 percent of the total value of all City contracts are awarded to MWBEs by 2021. The initiatives are crucial because when more New Yorkers make decent wages, and more small business from all backgrounds are successful, our city becomes stronger.

But Intro 1447 would disrupt these efforts and send our city – specifically our workers and small businesses – heading in the wrong direction. It would essentially move the goal posts when it comes to qualifying for employment in New York City’s construction industry – and while it is supposed to be about safety, its proposed changes do not seem to have any sensible rationale.

Intro 1447 would require construction workers to have dozens more hours of training than what is currently required. This training provision is the Trojan horse around which the rest of the legislation is based. That is because a signification portion of the additional training would not even deal with safety – instead, it would be about trade skills.

Of course we want to ensure that workers are safe, just as with so many other stakeholders in the construction industry. The problem here is that there are well over 100,000 construction workers across the five boroughs, and tens of thousands of them would not be able to immediately access or afford the additional training required under Intro 1447. These workers – the vast majority of whom are New York City residents and people of color – would very likely lose their jobs.

It seems to me like it will be very difficult for Mayor de Blasio to spark a net increase of 100,000 good-paying jobs if he starts by taking jobs away from thousands of construction workers.

Intro 1447 have a similar impact on MWBEs in the construction industry. That is mainly because the vast majority of MWBE contractors are emerging small businesses, with fewer financial capabilities than their competitors, and already struggle to afford the high costs of working on new projects.

The training mandate required under Intro 1447 would only make that problem much worse. By significantly increasing costs, the bill will only widen the gap between MWBE contractors and larger, more established builders. The most troubling thing here is that this could have all been avoided if the City Council actually took the time to engage with the MWBE community for feedback before pushing this bill on us out of nowhere.

Again, it seems hard to believe that the administration will be able to meet its 30 percent MWBE contracting goals if it prevents them from succeeding in one of the city’s largest industries.

The answer here is simple. New Yorkers should look to our City Council to support much-needed initiatives like the mayor’s push for more jobs and MWBE opportunities. If City Council members are serious about helping to make those visions a reality, they need to stop Intro 1447 are start over with a real dialogue that includes our voices, too.

Reverend Jacques Andre DeGraff is a leader of the One Hundred Black Men of New York and has led the School Construction Diversity Council that sets the statewide standard for MWBE participation. He has been honored by the City of New York as MWBE Advocate of the Year.

Welcome to the Norwood News, a bi-weekly community newspaper that primarily serves the northwest Bronx communities of Norwood, Bedford Park, Fordham and University Heights. Through our Breaking Bronx blog, we focus on news and information for those neighborhoods, but aim to cover as much Bronx-related news as possible. Founded in 1988 by Mosholu Preservation Corporation, a not-for-profit affiliate of Montefiore Medical Center, the Norwood News began as a monthly and grew to a bi-weekly in 1994. In September 2003 the paper expanded to cover University Heights and now covers all the neighborhoods of Community District 7. The Norwood News exists to foster communication among citizens and organizations and to be a tool for neighborhood development efforts. The Norwood News runs the Bronx Youth Journalism Heard, a journalism training program for Bronx high school students. As you navigate this website, please let us know if you discover any glitches or if you have any suggestions. We’d love to hear from you. You can send e-mails to norwoodnews@norwoodnews.org or call us anytime (718) 324-4998.

Like this story? Leave your comments below.

One thought on “Op-Ed: Construction Bill Would Harm Mayor’s MWBE and Job Creation Initiatives

  1. Roger Clegg

    Forget the bean counting and award contracts without regard to race or sex. Period. Anything else is unfair, divisive, inefficient, and illegal (indeed unconstitutional).

Comments are closed.