New zoning laws championed by Mayor Bill de Blasio with the approval of the City Council now make it easier for developers to build affordable housing without the addition of parking units, which could vastly impact the hundreds of drivers who rely on street parking in Norwood.
The complex zoning laws, falling under Zoning for Quality & Affordability (ZQA), and Mandatory Inclusionary Housing (MIH), are considered the DNA of de Blasio’s lofty Housing New York plan introduced in May 2014. The plan seeks to build 80,000 new units of affordable housing while repairing 120,000 more affordable units over the next decade. The plan looked to solve what the de Blasio Administration sees as an affordable housing crisis across the city.
“[W]e will look back on this as a pivotal moment when we turned the tide to keep our city a place for all New Yorkers,” said de Blasio, in a statement.
But a major change includes the elimination of the parking requirement for any new affordable and senior residences. Zoning rules on the books since the 1950s require that developers set aside parking units for tenants depending on how many apartment units were created. The New York City Department of City Planning views the construction of parking spots as a financial waste that hinders developers from building larger residences.
Developers who now build within so-called Transit Zones, areas the city defines as having an abundance of public transportation options, are now completely exempt from the parking requirement. Norwood and Bedford Park fall within a Transit Zone, given its proximity to the 2, 4, 5, B and D subway lines and two Metro-North train stations. While the Council pared back Transit Zones for Bronx neighborhoods in the fringes, it did not do so for Norwood. This could present issues down the road, given the swath of new affordable housing expected to be built along Webster Avenue. The corridor could be made even more attractive given the lifting of the parking requirement.
The Bronx Council Delegation voted almost unanimously in favor of ZQA and MIH. The lone dissenter on the ZQA vote on March 22 was Councilman Andrew Cohen, whose 11th Council District covers Norwood, Bedford Park, Woodlawn and Riverdale.
Cohen’s objection to the ZQA measure stemmed largely from its “one-size-fits-all” approach toward zoning, which broadly alters zoning laws instead of allowing customized rezoning according to the needs of the neighborhood.
“It is the locals who know their neighborhood best and I believe that communities should lead the way on the zoning of their district. While many of the changes made to the text are positive developments, based on this top-down approach, I cannot support ZQA,” said Cohen, in a statement.
Cohen was in favor of the MIH measure, which mandates developers designate 20 percent of its units to be affordable while lowering the area median income threshold to 40 percent. A family of four, for instance, would need a maximum $34,520 to qualify for an affordable apartment.
Cohen’s rejection of the measure also stemmed from the impact it would have on parking within his district, particularly Norwood, which greatly depends on street parking. On weekdays, it can take a half hour or more to find parking. Community Board 7, representing Norwood, Bedford Park, Kingsbridge Heights, Fordham, and University Heights, shot down the measure in November.
The zoning amendments are now in effect.
I have lived at 375 E. 205th Street since the mid-1970s. Both off street parking lots on Webster Avenue were sold and charter schools (and other businesses) were built on them. There are NO parking lots anywhere in Norwood. Even with my handicap parking permit, after late afternoon I can spend anywhere from 10-30 minutes looking for a spot due to all the muni meters, restrictions for the schools, and construction which has been unending for years. An 8 story building is going up on the east side of Webster next to one of the charter schools. Where are THOSE people going to park??? Any new housing on Webster Ave. is blocks from the subway, the last stop on the D train. Any upgrades to that station, which is full of people at rush hour?? This will have a major negative impact. Or do the politicians figure people in all this housing can’t afford a car, and neither can their visitors?
The city should plan for housing not parking. If there is a demand for parking someone can build a garage and rent the spaces but it is absurd to raise the costs of building housing by requiring parking. In fact, this rule should apply to all development not just subsidized housing.