States hoping to enable so-called “SCOFFLAW” drivers to run a red light or speed through the streets of New York City may want to reconsider their actions. Assemblyman Jeffrey Dinowitz (A.D. 81), who represents a large section of the Northwest Bronx, has introduced a new bill to counter legislative efforts in other U.S. states which seek to block the sharing [across states] of license plate and vehicle registration records in order to avoid red light camera and speed camera enforcement.
The new bill was primarily motivated by a separate New Jersey bill that passed the State Senate earlier this year (Senate Bill Number 460), which would “prohibit [the] State [of New Jersey] from disclosing New Jersey driver’s license holders’ personal information to other states seeking to issue speed camera or red light camera citations.” However, Dinowitz’s new law would apply to any state that seeks to implement a similar blocking measure.
The Dinowitz bill, known as the “Stop Careless Outsiders From Flouting Local Authority Wantonly” or SCOFFLAW Act (A10686), would grant, if passed, authority to the NYC Commissioner of Transportation to “impose a fee of fifty dollars [$50] on any vehicle entering The City of New York which displays a license plate from a state which does not provide or exchange reasonably necessary information … for the purpose of permitting the imposition of fines or penalties for traffic infractions.”
The SCOFFLAW Act specifies that such traffic infractions include those issued through traffic control signal monitoring systems (commonly known as red light cameras), speed control devices (commonly known as speed cameras), or other photo-monitoring systems that may be authorized for use by law enforcement authorities.
According to Dinowitz’s office, red light cameras have been in use in New York City since 1994, resulting in a decline of over 84 percent for average daily violations issued at each camera location. The assemblyman’s team said speed cameras have been in use in New York City since 2013, resulting in a similar 60 percent reduction of violations at each camera location.
In the context of the announcement of the bill, Dinowitz said, “It is absolutely ludicrous, and frankly a dereliction of the power of public officials, to attempt to create a system whereby drivers from one particular state would be able to recklessly ignore our traffic safety solutions.”
He added that he hoped the New Jersey general assembly would reject the bill which he said was “irresponsibly passed by their State Senate.” He said solutions such as the ones he proposes are not new and they work. “Drivers from every state should be held to the same standard,” he said.
Norwood News previously reported on how speeding has plagued The Bronx, causing unnecessary road deaths and injuries. New speeding violation rules, announced in May, went into effect on Aug. 1.
Tickets are now issued to drivers caught traveling 10 mph above the speed limit which are now captured on speed cameras that are operating 24/7, following sustained calls for the move by NYC Department of Transportation (DOT) officials. While this is good news, as previously reported, funding is still needed to not only expand the hours of operation of speed cameras, but to ensure that there are actually cameras installed in the vicinity of every public school across the City.
“If a state wants to stop cooperating with our traffic enforcement methods in New York, then our City will be forced to expend more money to maintain similar levels of safety,” Dinowitz added. “This proposal simply offers a mechanism to pay for the increased enforcement officers or other tools that would be required by uncooperative neighbors.”